Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts

Saturday, June 20, 2020

About white rose movement

I rad a tweet of a renowned politician as to how the intellectual who did not agree with Nazi Germany survived those fateful years.

There came a reply from someone about the white rose movement.

And I went straight to google search about it and got a good deal of information. 

So, there actually is a Center for white rose studies.

Now, that I haven't told about the white rose movement, it was a student led intellectual resistance to the then Nazi Germany.

The student group which were led by students from the Medical College from the University of Munich. 

They published leaflets with references from literary stalwarts like Goethe etc.

A portion from the leaflet is given below:

Nothing is more shameful to a civilized nation than to allow itself to be “governed” by an irresponsible clique of sovereigns who have given themselves over to dark urges – and that without resisting. Isn’t it true that every honest German is ashamed of his government these days? Who among us can imagine the degree of shame that will come upon us and upon our children when the veil falls from our faces and the awful crimes that infinitely exceed any human measure are exposed to the light of day? If the German nation is so corrupt and decadent in its innermost being that it is willing to surrender the greatest possession a man can own, a possession that elevates mankind above all other creatures, namely free will – if it is willing to surrender this without so much as raising a hand, rashly trusting a questionable lawful order of history; if it surrenders the freedom of mankind to intrude upon the wheel of history and subjugate it to his own rational decision; if Germans are so devoid of individuality that they have become an unthinking and cowardly mob – then, yes then they deserve their destruction.

Friday, August 15, 2014

Independence Day Thoughts

"Peace has been said to be indivisible; so is freedom, so is prosperity now, and so also is disaster in this one world that can no longer be split into isolated fragments."

-Jawahar Lal Nehru in his speech on the midnight of 14th August 1947

Now one can imagine what our first PM wanted to convey with these words, when there is peace in pockets and turmoil all over , when there is freedom for some and others are kept captive without having any rights, when properity is in the hands of chosen few, and the concern for a disaster in one part of the country never bothers us, then we have failed to achieve what we wanted. Some day we will.

I remember the famous lines of another visionary poet Faiz Ahmed Faiz who wrote these lines on the Independence

"ye daag daag ujaalaa, ye shab-gazidaa sahar
wo intazaar tha jis kaa, ye wo sahar to nahin

abhi garaani-e-shab me kami nahin aai
najaat-e-dida-o-dil ki ghadi nahin aai
chale chalo ki wo manzil abhi nahin aai"


In the past 68 years we have achieved a lot as a nation, with adult franchise, political freedom, economic growth and social upliftment but at the same time the ideals have now deterioted.

The fundamental duties (some of them) as a citizen of this country are:-

1. To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;
2. To cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom;
3. To uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;
4. To defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so;
5. To promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;
6. To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture;

In the last 68 years, what we have achieved is that Secular has become SICKULAR. We don't give a damn to composite culture, dignity of women is compromised on daily basis, language is cause of fight among people, regionalism is on the rise, national service means how to make more money out of wreched people, noble ideas which inspired national struggle for freedom are hardly known to any and we won't even bother to read them, respect for constitutional institutions is on the verge of decline, and Who reads Constitution if it will not be asked in the Civil Services Exam.

At least on this day there should be a pledge by each one of us to make this country a better country. No matter how small our contribution is, but it will be counted.

As Dr. Ambedkar said that "Social and Economic Freedom is more important than political freedom and it should be given more importance and without socio-economic freedom the political freedom is of little use". 

We must all strive for achieving that.

Friday, August 8, 2014

B R Ambedkar & his views

"But if the fundamental rights are opposed by the community, no Law, no Parliament, no judiciary can guarantee them in the real sense of the word. What is the use of the fundamental rights to the Negroes in America, to the Jews in Germany and to the Untouchables in India? As Burke said, there is no method found for punishing the multitude. Law can punish a single solitary recalcitrant criminal. It can never operate against a whole body of people who aredetermined to defy it. Social conscience—to use the language of Coleridge—that calm incorruptible legislator of the soul without whom ail other powers would “meet in mere oppugnancy— is the only safeguard of all rightsfundamental or non-fundamental"




                                            -B R Ambedkar in his speech on 18th January 1943 


The words of Ambedkar said in 1943 are still apt in the present circumstances.  A person has a right to choose his/her life partner. In the manner which the Khap Panchayats operate and issue their farmaans against the individuals is a blatant example.

In the election year 2014, due to vote bank politics, these feeling of the view of the majority, be it caste majority, religious majority or the ethnic majority is given precedence over the legitimacy of the demands.

Jats have got reservation under the OBC quota, just before the election to gain votes as they have a sizable population. 

A person has  a right to move freely in the country and reside anywhere. Though in legal and constitutional terms it is valid, but still people face discrimination based on their language, gender, religion and caste. Finding a place in cities for certain sections of the society is getting really difficult.

What is happening is the compartmentalization of society with building walls around each other which is based on community. In the earlier village society, different communities had different geographical areas in the village, the SC basti, Muslim Basti and so on. Now the same is happening in the cities also.

The BJP and Congress have promised 100 modern cities (BJP) and 100 modern city clusters (Congress). But nobody is asking how these model cities will look like. 

Whether these cities will have colonies based on relgion, like Parsi Colony, Muslim Colony, jain Colony and so on? 

Whether in these modern cities too, the civic amenities will be provided on an area basis, which is visible in cities of India, with no Bank, Public Toilets and Govt. Schools in minority concentrated areas.

The BJP has not mentioned the Sachar Committee Report in its manifesto under the Minorty Agenda while Congress has mentioned that. BJP is totally against this whole idea of Committee based on religion while there can be committees based on caste. We must understand that ours is not a democratic society and it will take time to make it one. This is what Ambedkar had to say about that:



"A democratic form of Government presupposes a democratic form of society. The formal framework of democracy is of no value and would indeed be a misfit if there was no social democracy. The politicals never realized that democracy was not a form of Government. It was essentially a form of society. It may not be necessary for a democratic society to be marked by unity, by community of purpose, by loyalty to public ends and by mutuality ofsympathy. But it does unmistakably involve two things. The first is an attitude of mind, an attitude of respect and equality towards their fellows. The second is a social organization free from rigid social barriers. Democracy is incompatible and inconsistent with isolation and exclusiveness, resulting in the distinction between the privilegedand the unprivileged."




They say equal treatment to all. Though that is a constitutional right but when we see the ground reality, nothing like that exists.

Only governance can not much do if it is not inclusive. Although Congress promised that but they could not deliver much. We can doubt their ability and intention but we can outcry this demand of Inclusive Governance which is the need of the hour.

The sense of alienation which is felt by the minorities of the country will not vanish away just by saying that they are equal. They must be treated that way. 

On saying this the people oppose this logic that then there should be no reservation based on Caste and Religion and then equality will arrive.

Though that is good for the society but not without reaching to and equal society. Till the time we reach there reservation is required, but there should be proper evaluation of the benefits achieved by that and revision of the policy. 

How many of us could have known if Sachar Committee report was not out, that the condition of muslims is worse than the dalits.

Hardly any? 

What BJP is saying is scrap all the bullshit and there will be equality. But how is that possible. If the facilities are not provided on an equal basis how will the people of the marginalized communities will succeed. 

Provide the marginalized communities with better public amenities like schools, financial capital just as it is available to others. Now this has to be geographical. The Sachar Committee vouched for special plans for minority concentrated areas. Without this proper emphasis, if you scrap the reservation in jobs, education etc. They will be left behind where they were. 

Only at a later stage when we become a truly democratic society then only the safeguards should be removed. Otherwise the system will collapse with one side having the rosy picture while other side having a grim.

Israel & Palestine

Why Gaza Strip is under attack and not the West Bank, while both are the part of the present Palestine State?


While the solidarity being shown with the people of Gaza Strip is entirely justified, the people must not support the rulers/govt. of Gaza Strip ( mainly Hamas, allegedly a terrorist group, they too are the nationalists as the Palestinians perceive them to be ). They have been foolish and immature in finding a peaceful resolution of the Israel Palestine Conflict and have dragged the people in shit hole. 

Present Palestine consists of West Bank and Gaza Strip and the road which connects the both is under the Israeli occupation. If people are not able to relate with it, they must consider the old east and west Pakistan example.

Now the recent attacks are mostly on the Gaza Strip and not on the West Bank. We must ask why ?

West Bank is under the rule of Al Fatah group , Palestinian National Authority (The late Yasir Arafat was its head). The Oslo Accord of 1993/95 was between the Palestine Liberation Organisation head Yasir Arafat and Israeli President Yitzhak Rabin. 

The Right Wing Israelis killed president Rabin because of their unhappiness with the Oslo Accord. The Right Wing Palestinians (read Hamas) disagreed with the decision of the Al Fatah group to renounce armed struggle. They now rule the Gaza Strip. 

My point is simple any right wing will not be happy with peace and tranquility and wage unnecessary war to justify their deeds. They create a false enemy to bring in solidarity between the people and exploit the emotions of the people. Same is true with military/intelligence led govt of Israel and with the govt. of Gaza Strip, because who does not love a WAR (military corporations love it, the rogue states loves it, stinking politicians love it and so on..) except the people and the soldiers. 

The second question is that why Arab World is silent over the tragic situation of the people in Gaza?

The support to Al Fatah group comes from the Arab World. The Al Fatah group now is not waging an armed struggle against Israel. They have accepted the ideology of the Late Yasir Arafat and respect the Oslo Accord. 

The support to Hamas group mainly comes from Iran and Syria. So, the rest of the Arab world which acts against the Iran superiority is silent, while they should at-least raise their voice. 

Now, there can be people who might agree or disagree with the Oslo Accord. But in the present situation, for the peace in the region the Hamas too should agree to the renounce the armed struggle. The Israel's claim to Palestine, their aggression, their occupation of the Palestinian territory is all wrong. But, if the faction of the Palestinian people think they will get , their legitimate claim by force they are wrong. They were once defeated in the Arab- Israel War in 1948 where there were three countries together because the USA supported the Israel and it always will. 

So, they should immediately stop this small rocket practice on Israel because it will not harm anyone in Israel but will give enough reason to Israel to attack Gaza. 

The civilians in Gaza are really unfortunate. They are caught between two extremes - One is their govt. another is Israel govt. And no one wants to stop. It is really unfortunate for people of GAZA.

fight for justice

A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. 


As long as justice and injustice have not terminated their ever-renewing fight for ascendancy in the affairs of mankind, human beings must be willing, when need is, to do battle for the one against the other.” 


― John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy

Friday, April 18, 2014

Gorakh Pandey

It's thousands of years old
their anger

thousand of years old
is their bitterness

I am only returning their scattered words
with rhyme and rhythm

and you fear that
I am spreading fire.

-by Gorakh Pandey

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Freedom of Criticism

"Freedom" is a grand word, but under the banner of freedom for industry the most predatory wars were waged, under the freedom of labour, the working people were robbed.

The modern use of the term "freedom of criticism" contains the same inherent falsehood. Those who are really convinced that they have made progress in science would not demand freedom for the new views to continue side by side with the old, but the substitution of the new views for the old. The cry heard today, "long live freedom of criticism", is too strongly reminiscent of the fable of the empty barrel.

(Lenin - in his book "What is to be done?")

Al Farabi on Societies

Al-Farabi was a famous philosopher from the Islamic philosophy tradition. On the question of why and how societies decline from the ideal, h...